Your ISO 26262 program.
Without the manual work.
Safety teams spend months producing the traceability matrices, deviation records, and audit evidence their certification requires. Coda generates them automatically from every analysis run, and evaluates the 68 AUTOSAR rules no static analysis tool can fully check. So your engineers spend time on engineering, not documentation.
Certification prep
is eating your program
The software is written. The analysis tools have run. But the work that actually gets you to certification: the documentation, the evidence trail, the deviation management. It still happens manually, in spreadsheets and Word documents, by engineers who should be doing something else.
Traceability built by hand
ISO 26262 Part 6 requires a traced chain from requirement to rule to code to compliance status. Your team assembles this manually from static analysis output, every release cycle.
Deviations managed in email
Every formally approved rule deviation needs a justification, risk assessment, compensating measures, and sign-off. Most teams track these in shared documents with no expiry management or audit trail.
No visibility until the audit
Teams find out where they stand on certification readiness when auditors tell them, often late in the program, when the cost of fixing it is highest.
Semantic rules not fully checked
68 AUTOSAR rules are non-automated or only partially automated. They require human judgment, not just syntax checking. They get reviewed manually, inconsistently, or not at all.
Three things you do manually.
Coda does them automatically.
Deviation records
Traceability matrices
Certification readiness
Know where you stand.
Every week, not at audit time.
The certification readiness dashboard gives safety managers a live view of program status: violations, deviations, traceability coverage, and the specific blockers preventing sign-off.
Updated on every run
Readiness score recalculates automatically after every Coda analysis. No manual status updates.
Blockers surfaced immediately
Expiring deviations, unresolved violations, and missing artifacts flagged before they become audit findings.
30-day trend
See whether the program is improving week-over-week. Evidence of systematic progress to share with program management.
The ISO 26262 evidence document.
Generated, not written.
Every Coda run produces a full traceability matrix in ISO 26262 Part 6 format: rule to code location to compliance status to evidence. What your team currently assembles manually over weeks, available instantly.
| Rule | Description | Checker | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A10-0-1 | Public inheritance shall implement "is-a" relationships | CODA | vehicle_controller.cpp:42 · run 2026-03-27 | VIOLATION |
| A10-0-2 | Membership or non-public inheritance for "has-a" | CODA | DEV-001 · J. Smith · 2026-01-15 | DEVIATED |
| A9-5-1 | Unions shall not be used | AST | All modules · run 2026-03-27 | COMPLIANT |
| A27-0-1 | Inputs from independent components shall be validated | CODA | radar_input.cpp:156 · run 2026-03-27 | VIOLATION |
| A12-4-1 | Destructor of base class shall be public virtual | AST | All modules · run 2026-03-27 | COMPLIANT |
Built for where the industry is heading.
Starting with AUTOSAR C++14, the current standard for safety-critical C++ development. Expanding to MISRA C++:2023 and the emerging standards for ML-integrated and physical AI systems.
See Coda run on
your codebase.
We'll walk through the full pipeline against a real C++ codebase: violations, traceability report, deviation manager, and certification readiness dashboard.
Usually a 30-minute call. We bring the demo environment.